‘Potential Dangerous’: Health experts call Alberta Kovid report an attempt to rewrite history.

Alberta’s Health Minister says that it includes a “wide range of perspective” – ​​includes health care professionals, academics, researchers and advisers, and the recommendations of those recommendations on how the government may be in a better position to protect health and safety. Gives Albertons in the future. “

Critics call it “sad document – which lacks significant reliability”, “takes out many pieces of information.”

Alberta’s government quietly published on Friday afternoon (January 24, 2025) Report of Task Force, who evaluated the response of the province of the Kovid -19 epidemic.

Daniel Smith made a report with a billion dollar budget shortly after Daniel Smith entered power in the late 2022, promising to resolve the Kovid -19 complaints of his supporters.

Former Chief of Emergency Medicine at Red Deer Hospital DR .. Gary Davidson was chaired by Gary Davidson, who accused the province of exaggerated Kovid -19 on the province during the height of the epidemic, and said that the number of admission to the hospital was exacerbated. Cleverly to make.

Smith defended Davidson’s appointment, saying that she wanted to hear a wide range of views, “shouted in the public field.”

Among the other dozen members of the Task Force, the clarification of the American Kovid -19 policies. Jay Bhattacharya and the US There was also the choice of President Donald Trump to run the National National Institute of Health for Health.

But DR DR DR DR .. Brian Conway, the center of Vancouver Infectious Diseases, criticized the document, “This is a report that is clearly written by the agendas who did not want to be a peer review.”

“Dee’s violence (former Alberta Chief Medical Officer) is not even involved as a contributor and will comment on the report – and is the leader of all decisions made in Alberta. How can you write a report about what happened in Alberta without the violence of D, “Conway asked.

“Some major decision makers, who are not in the government, but obviously in the government, will not talk to the Task Force because I think they feel – and properly – that deck was already stacked in front of them,” Mount said Was. Royal University’s political expression .An Professor, Dune Brett.

“I think what happened here. It was a group of people who have been selected, which are already known in the public sector, such as vaccination, and you know, to keep extreme or fringe opinions about sanctions, public health restrictions, “DR .. Infectious disease specialist at Alberta University.

The report is 269-schemes long and has a long list of complaints about the respondent response to the province.

In the findings and recommendations of reports:

• He says that Alberta should refrain from the future mask command for respiratory ailments, because “there is no benefit to masking asymptomatic individuals,” and quoting the potential loss of masking, such as self-malignant, uncomfortable and false sense of safety “;
• It criticizes the use of Lock Kadowns to control the spread of the disease, saying “NPI (non -pharmaceutical measures) has a slightly relevant effect on the development of infections”;
• It says that quick tests with reasonable accuracy should not be used to investigate the general population and “future epidemic responses should prefer to reduce serious disease and mortality, which is higher than the investigation of the widespread case,”
• It promotes herd-protection or “infection-genre immunity” that says it “poorly understood”-anything 430 BC was never attacked twice during the Athenian plague of the receiving persons- At least never fatal. “
• It says that the right to the physician’s instructions needs to be more protected and the ability of a pharmacist to promote alternative treatments such as veremectin and hydroxyclerquin, that, in his professional judgment – is in the Best interest of the patient; And,,
• It recommends that the Alberta government immediately prevented the use of all Kovid -19 vaccines without the fact that their physician has fully declared patients full of safety and effectiveness, which is based on the evidence emerging to the date -most of which are provided by the vaccine manufacturers. Came. -It cannot be concluded that this Kovid -19 vaccine is safe. “

“This is completely dangerous, “DR .. Conway said. “It speaks of the fact that we have ignored natural immunity – hybrid immunity. We didn’t. This was part of the very early messaging. It talks about the vaccine being ineffective. It is very effective. Before the clinical trials published the initial trials report, we said that the effectiveness of 50 percent in this trial would be something very important – but it was more than 80 percent.

“It’s taking several pieces of information outside the context,” Conway said. “So it is surprising to me that this kind of document can take it to the premiere’s office fees and gain any credibility.”

D Sax. The S X XSinggar describes the report as “an attempt to rewrite history”.

“I really have a colleague who was on our Vijay. Annik Advisory Group listed as a contributor, who really asked to withdraw his name.”

“If you take it to the value of the facial, it will really question you everything in the epidemic, and I don’t think people should do it.” “If you believe that the result of these recommendations would be more form of US -style approach – there would have been 15,000 deaths in Alberta, and it is much more than they really saw.”

Speaking at Alberta Podcast on Friday, chairman of the task force, DR DR .. Davidson defended the panel’s research methods, “There is no such thing as a consensus – it has no point in the wake. Whether it is about improvement. True or not… it’s a matter of time. “

In a statement to Global News, Alberta’s Health Minister Adriana Legranje’s office said, “The Alberta government will review and consider it, however, no policy decision has been taken at this time.”

And Copy 2025 Global News, Department of Course Entertainment Inc.